[1] University Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia; Applied Science Private University, Jordan, ORCID: 0000-0002-1334-6268, radzuwanrashid@unisza.edu.my
Abstract
This article explores the discursive construction of victimhood on social media, specifically examining how the experiences of people living in Gaza are represented on Facebook. Drawing on van Dijk’s socio-cognitive framework, this study employed a thematic approach to analyse a dataset of 95 Facebook postings made by Gazans in response to the war following October 7, 2023. Data analysis revealed five themes that were central to Gazan victimhood. These themes include the negative other, deprivation of fundamental rights, sense of loss, positive self-description, and satisfaction with fate. While these themes emphasise the paucity of essentials, the profound loss of loved ones, and the view of others as hostile or indifferent, they also illuminate the resilience of the Gazan populace and their satisfaction with their destiny. Eight discursive strategies emerge in the identified themes: polarisation, concretisation, compassion move, self-identity descriptions, negative lexicalisation, victimisation, hyperbole, and warning. These strategies are intricately linked to the semantic and contextual models posited by van Dijk’s socio-cognitive framework. Constructing Gazans’ victimhood enhances their positive self-image, while fostering a negative image of the other. This study is hoped to enhance our understanding of how social media postings can be leveraged to construct and communicate the concept of victimhood.
Keywords: victimhood, Gazan people, social media, critical studies, critical realism
References
Al-Ramahi, R. A., and Ab Rashid, R. (2019). Theorizing critical populist discourse analysis: A new plau- sible paradigm. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1), 422-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp422-444
Al-Ramahi, R., and Rashid, R. (2024). The discursive identities of Hamas and Israel in British newspapers: A socio-cognitive analysis. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 30(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3003-01
Al-Seheel, A. Y., and Noor, N. M. (2016). Effects of an Islamic-based gratitude strategy on Muslim students’ level of happiness. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 19(7), 686-703. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2016.1229287
Armaly, M. T., and Enders, A. M. (2022). ‘Why me?’ The role of perceived victimhood in American poli- tics. Political Behavior, 44(4), 1583–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09662-x
Bakis, K., and Karakoç, J. (2015). Authoritarianism in the Middle East. Palgrave Macmillan.
Berbrier, M. (2000). The victim ideology of white supremacists and white separatists in the United States. Sociological Focus, 33(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2000.10571164
Bhuiyan, S. I. (2011). Social media and its effectiveness in the political reform movement in Egypt. Middle East Media Educator, 1(1), 12-20.
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., and Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15 (4), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00340.x
Campbell, B., and Manning, J. (2018). The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars. Canada: Palgrave Macmillan.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. John Wiley & Sons.
Chouliaraki, L. (2021). Victimhood: The affective politics of vulnerability. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420979316
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., and Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Dolhan, N., Othman, Z., and Idris, N. A. (2021). Human trafficking and human security in South east Asia: A case study of Bangladeshi foreign workers in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(1), 136-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss1pp136-155
Domalewska, D. (2019). The role of social media in emergency management during the 2019 flood in Po- land. Security and Defence Quarterly, 27(5), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/110722
Elizur, Y., and Yishay-Krien, N. (2009). Participation in atrocities among Israeli soldiers during the first intifada: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 46(2), 251–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308100718
Foringer, K. (2023). Defining victimhood: The political construction of a “victim” category in Colombia’s Congress, 2007–2011. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 65(1), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417522000433
Gilbert, P. (2009). The Compassionate Mind: A New Approach to Life’s Challenges. London: Constable and Robinson Ltd.
Gordon, L. (2004). Critical reflections on three popular tropes in the study of whiteness. In: Yancy, G. ed 2004. What White Looks Like: African American Philosophers on the Whiteness Question. New York: Routledge. Pp. 173-193.
Gray, K., and Kubin, E. (2024). Victimhood: The most powerful force in morality and politics. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 137-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.03.004
Håkansson, J. (2012). The use of personal pronouns in political speeches: A comparative study of the pro- nominal choices of two American presidents (Unpublished B.A. dissertation). Linnaeus University.
Holstein, J. A., and Miller, G. (1990). Rethinking victimization: An interactional approach to victimology. Symbolic Interaction, 13(1), 103–122.
Hyland-Wood, B. (2023). Open public data: How we use it and how it uses us. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2022i0.13025
Illouz, E. (2003). Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery: An Essay on Popular Culture. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Jensen, S., and Ronsbo, H. (2024). Histories of Victimhood: Ethnography of Political Violence. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kaur, K., Ibrahim, N. A., and Wan Adnan, W. N. A. (2023). Social media support for women with en- dometriosis: A systematic review. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(1), 289-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp289-315
Krystalli, R. C. (2021). Narrating victimhood: dilemmas and (in)dignities. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 23(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2020.1861961
Majul, M. (2017). Turning the tide: Protest poems on martial law as counter-memory. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(1) 111-121. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss1pp111-121
Meier, P. (2012). Crisis mapping in action: How open-source software and global volunteer networks are changing the world, One map at a time. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 8(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2012.663739
Meraz, S., and Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472
Miranda, A., Boland, A., and Hemmler, M. (2009). Understanding privilege in America. In: Jones, J. M. ed 2009. The Psychology of Multiculturalism in Schools: A Primer for Practice, Training, and Research. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. Pp. 67–82.
Mohammed Na’aim, M. S., Rajamanickam, R., and Nordin, R. (2019). Female victims of domestic violence and their rights to compensation in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1), 384-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp384-400
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage.
Persily, N., and Tucker, J. A. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, prospects for Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pettersson, T., and Öberg, M. (2020). Organized violence, 1989–2019. Journal of Peace Research, 57(4), 597-613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320934986
Polo, S., and Gleditsch, K. (2016). Twisting arms and sending messages: Terrorist tactics in Civil War. Journal of Peace Research, 53(6), 815–829. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44510462
Prier, J. (2020). Commanding the Trend. Social Media as Information Warfare. In: Whyte, C., Thrall, A. and Mazanec, B. eds 2020. Information Warfare in the Age of Cyber Conflict. New York: Routledge. Pp.88-113.
Salem, F., and Mourtada, R. (2011). Civil movements: The impact of Facebook and Twitter”. Retrieved October 16, 2025 from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/dsg/unpan050860.pdf.
Shin, D., and Kadiyala, B. (July 12, 2022). Social learning with polarized preferences on content platforms. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3916284 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3916284
Singer, P. W., and Brooking, E. T. (2018). Like War: The Weaponization of Social Media. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: Eamon Dolan Books.
Stanton, J. (2013). Terrorism in the context of civil war. The Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1009–1022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000984
Strobl, R. (2010). Becoming a Victim. In: Giora Shoham, S., Knepper, P., and Kett, M. eds 2010. International Handbook of Victimology. London: Routledge. Pp. 3–26.
Thunberg, S. (2020). Victimization, positioning, and support. Young victims’ experiences of crime (Doctoral thesis). Örebro University, Örebro.
Valentino, B. (2014). Why we kill: the political science of political violence against civilians. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-082112-141937
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Ideological Discourse Analysis. In: Ventola, E. and Solin, A. eds 1995. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Discourse Analysis. New Courant: University of Helsinki. Pp. 57-154.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as Interaction in Society. In Van Dijk, T. A. ed 1997. Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage. Pp. 1-37.
van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra
University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. eds 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse. London: Sage. Pp. 95-120.
van Dijk, T. A. (June 7, 2004). Politics, ideology, and discourse. http://wwww.discourse-in-society.org/teun.html
van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: A Socio-cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Studies: A Socio-cognitive Approach. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. eds 2015. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage. Pp.62–85.
van Dijk, T. A. (2018). Socio-cognitive Discourse Studies. In: Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. E. eds 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge. Pp. 26-43.
Vinson, J. (September 3, 2011). Social networks become preferred lines of communication during Japan earthquake. WebProNews.com. http://www.webpronews.com/japan-earthquakesocial-network-in-2011-03
Wood, E. J. (2018). Rape as a practice of war: Toward a typology of political violence. Politics & Society, 46(4), 513-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329218773710