[1] Department of Thai, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University, Thailand ORCID: 0000-0001-7482-4692, rakoffer@gmail.com
[2] Department of Thai, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University, Thailand ORCID: 0000-0008-6929-5982, jantima21@gmail.com
Abstract
Thai newspapers limit the recognition of intersex autonomy. They often portray intersex bodies as obstacles to the expression of naturalized masculine and feminine identities. This study analyzes how Thai newspaper clauses representing intersex individuals contribute to meaning-making within a Systemic Functional Grammar perspective. The study assumes that intersex bodies are consistently depicted as sites of gender performativity and serve as focal points for broader societal debates about the “real” sex and gender. Data were collected from online news articles published between 2012 and 2023 by seven Thai news agencies: BBC Thai, Daily News, Ejan, Khaosod, Matichon, MGR Online, and Thairath. A total of 36 articles were examined. The findings show that intersex voices predominantly appear in mental and relational clauses. These clauses construct experiential meanings that encode categorical relationships between intersex individuals and atypical conditions, framing them as matters of medical necessity. Thai newspapers frequently invoke authoritative medical voices to reinforce the perceived need for medical intervention, particularly in the case of intersex children. These medical voices mainly occur in verbal and material clauses, where they interact with the voices of parents, government agencies, and charity officers to legitimize appeals for “sex-normalizing” procedures. Government voices foreground social constraints through behavioral clauses, reinforcing the alienation experienced by intersex children. This study argues that Thai newspapers align biological sex with the gender binary, thereby perpetuating the perceived naturalness of masculine and feminine identities. Variations in sex development, especially among children, are framed as urgent problems that require intervention to conform to socially accepted gender norms.
Keywords: bodies, gender binary, transitivity analysis, intersex, Thai newspapers
References
Amato, V. (2016). Intersex narratives: Shifts in the representation of intersex lives in North American liter- ature and popular culture. Transcript publishing.
Bastien-Charlebois, J. (2016, October 18). How medical discourse dehumanizes intersex people. Intersex Day.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2006). Gender, sexuality, and language. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 756-758). Elsevier Science.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. Routledge.
Carpenter, M. (2021). Intersex human rights, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex characteristics and the Yogyakarta Principles plus 10. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 23(4), 516–532.
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Bloomsbury.
Funk, F., Funk, S., & Whelan, S. B. (2019). Trans*+ and intersex representation and pathologization: An
interdisciplinary argument for increased medical privacy. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 34(1), 117–148.
Gal, S. (1995). Language, Gender, and Power: An Anthropological Review. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.),
Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self (pp. 169–182). Routledge. Guntram, L., & Zeiler, K. (2016). You have all those emotions inside that you cannot show because of what they will cause: Disclosing the absence of one’s uterus and vagina. Social Science & Medicine, 167(1), 63–70.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hegarty, P., Donnelly, L., Dutton, P. F., Gillingham, S., Vecchietti, V., & Williams, K. (2021). Understanding of intersex: The meanings of umbrella terms and opinions about medical and social responses among laypeople in the United States and United Kingdom. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 8(1), 25–37.
Henningham, M. (2019). Born this way: The healthcare, sexuality, and social experiences of people with intersex variations [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Sydney].
Holms, M. (2009). Critical intersex. Routledge.
Jackson, P. (2004). Phet: An indigenous Thai discourse why Foucault’s theory of sexuality must be adapted in studying Thai culture. Journal of Language and Culture, 23(1), 57–66.
Johnson, D. (2017). Living intersex reconceptualising dualistic notions of sex and the body [Doctoral dissertation, King’s College].
Jones, C. (2016). Diagnosing sex stories of intersex, relationships & identity [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield].
Kerry, S. (2011). Representation of intersex in news media: The case of Kathleen Worrall. Journal of Gender Studies, 20(3), 263–277.
King, B. W. (2015). Becoming the intelligible other: speaking intersex bodies against the grain. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(4), 359–378.
Kirdchok, P., Chandarasiri, P., & Sahakitrungruang, T. (2017). Sex assignment, gender identity, and gender roles in patients with ambiguous genitalia at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Chulalongkorn Medical Journal, 61(3), 373–385.
Komutee, P. (2020). Rights and liberties in marriage of alternative sexual people [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University].
Lakof, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. Harper & Row.
Lane, J. M. (2018). Reproducing intersex trouble: An analysis of the M.C. Case in the media [Master’s thesis, University of South Florida].
Mahanarongchai, S., & Chatsuwan, T. (2024). “Pandaka” and man’s ordination in Theravada Buddhism, Chiang Mai University Journal of Humanities, 25(3), 149-170.
Mangkud, T. (2021). Understanding of the Thai laws of transgenderism: A discourse analysis of the legal development in the period of 2007-2019 [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University].
Mestre, Y. (2022). The human rights situation of intersex people: An analysis of Europe and Latin America. Social Sciences, 11(7), 1–18.\
Rangnoy, T. (2023). Gender politics: A collective identity and political ideology of gay group in the context of political conflict and polarization [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University].
Roemer, M. (2023). Making intersex and non-binary people count? ambivalent in visibilities in the German micro census. Journal of Gender Studies, 32(8), 898–909.
Samanchan, P. (2024, November 24). The appearance of the term “kathoey” in early historical documentsrefers to which group of people? Silpa Mag. https://www.silpa-mag.com/culture/article_96855
Secomb, L. (2017). Performing friendship. In C. Hite (Ed.), Derrida and queer theory (pp. 234–249). Punctum Books.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description. In K. H. Basso, & H. A. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in Anthropology (pp. 11-55). University of New Mexico Press.
Sirisakko, K. (2023). Sexual ethics in Buddhist philosophical perspective. Journal of MCU Philosophy Review, 5(1), 25-41.
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Thongkrajai, C. (2023). From “Kathoey” to “Phuying-kham-phet”: Discursive transformation of gender identity in Thailand. Journal of Anthropology, Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre (JASAC), 6(1), 143-182.
Watcharasakaowong, N., & Muangtham, W. (2024). The problem of protection of the rights of intersex persons according to the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand 2017. Doctor of Philosophy in Social Sciences Journal, 3(1), 65–81.
Yooman, P. (2016). Justification: Study of consent on the transsexual surgery in child [Master’s thesis], Thammasat University].