A Socio-Cognitive Representation of Muslims in the British Quality Newspapers

Sabra Hasan Ghanim [1] & Ahmed Qadoury Abed [2]

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10290323

[1] Mustansiriyah University, College of Arts, Iraq, email: translators82@gmail.com

[2] Mustansiriyah University, College of Arts, Iraq. Corresponding author, ORCID:0000-0003-4255-5824, email: dr.ahmed_qadouriy@uomustansiriyah.edu.iq

Abstract

The British newspapers frequently discuss Muslims, typically in regard to religion, even when the topic under discussion is one of social, political, or educational concern. This study examines how Muslims are represented by a socio-cognitive analysis to critically investigate the selected linguistic constructs and their consequences on social representation and the construal operations in the reader’s mind. To that purpose, eight news articles from The Times, The Telegraph, The Guardian, and The Independent covering Muslim-related subjects are selected in order to be analysed using the adapted van Leeuwen’s (2008) and Hart’s (2010) multimodal framework. The qualitative-quantitative analysis explores how Muslims are portrayed socially in the chosen data, cognitively in the specified social practices, what role social and cognitive discursive strategies play in reinforcing or challenging ideology as a socio-cognitive phenomenon, and finally, how the representation varies in the specified newspapers to reflect political leaning and conflicts at the time. The data shows Muslim inclusion and activation rates that are statistically significant. In most cases, backgrounding of Muslims conjures up negative associations. The results demonstrate that the reports contain social and cognitive discursive construction patterns that portray Muslims unfavourably in comparison to other social groups, and that the patterns are a reflection of the ideologies of the producers. A key result is that political conflicts in which Muslims have little involvement affect the way Muslims are represented, like gender politics and election rivalry.

Keywords: Critical discourse analysis, socio-cognitive analysis, ideology, British newspapers, Muslims.

References

AbdulWahid, A.M.R. (2020). Social actors in Sinan Antoon’s ‘The Corpse Washer’: A critical discourse analysis [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Kufa.

Abed, A.Q. (2016). Anti-Prophet Muhammad media: A critical discourse analysis of its production in British and American newspapers. Lambert Academic Publishing.

Allen, C. (2004). Justifying Islamophobia: A post-9/11 consideration of the European Union and British contexts. American Journal of Islam and Society, 21(3), 1-25.

Allen (2010). Islamophobia. Ashgate.

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press 1998–2009. Cambridge University Press.
 

Cap, P. (2006). Legitimisation in political discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Cap, P. (2010). Proximizing objects, Proximizing values: Towards an axiological contribution to the discourse of legitimization. In U. Okulska & P. Cap (Eds.), Perspectives in politics and discourse (pp. 119- 42).

Benjamins. Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Chilton, P. (2005b). Manipulation, memes and metaphors: The case of Mein Kampf. In de Saussure, L. & Schulz, P. Manipulation and ideologies in the Twentieth century: Discourse, language, mind (pp. 15-43). Benjamins.

Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design. Sage.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.

Hanif, F. (Ed.). (2019). State of media reporting on Islam & Muslims. Quarterly Report: Oct – Dec 2018. The Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM).

Hanif, F. (Ed.). (2021). British media’s coverage of Muslims and Islam (2018-2020). The Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM).

Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Palgrave.

Hart, C. (2013a). Constructing contexts through grammar: Cognitive models and conceptualisation in British newspaper reports of political protests. In J. Flowerdew (ed.) (2013). Discourse and Contexts (pp. 159-184). Continuum.

Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. Bloomsbury Publishing. Hart, C. (Ed.). (2020). Researching discourse: A student guide. Routledge.

Hodge, B. R. I. V., & Kress, G. R. (1993). Language as ideology (2nd ed.). Routledge

Koller, V. (2003). Metaphor clusters in business media discourse: A social cognition approach [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Vienna.

Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Palgrave. Koller, V. (2020). Analysing metaphor in discourse. In C., Hart (Ed.), Researching discourse: A student guide (pp.77-96). Routledge.

Kowalski, G. (2018). Proximization as reception. Bulletin of the Transilvania university of Braşov, series VII. Social

Sciences and Law, 11(1), 125-138.

Richardson, J. E. (2004). (Mis)Representing Islam: The racism and rhetoric of British broadsheet newspapers. Benjamins.

Sardar, Z. (2004). The excluded minority: British Muslim identity after 11 September. In P. Griffith, & M. Leonard (Eds.), Reclaiming Britishness (pp. 51-56). The Foreign Policy Centre.

Tavassoli, F., Jalilifar, A., & White, P. (2019). British newspapers’ stance towards the Syrian refugee crisis: An appraisal model study. Discourse & Society, 30(1) 64–84.

Trim, R. (2023). Hidden reference in the creation of Metaphor. In M. Prandi & M. Rossi(Eds.), Researching Metaphors (1st ed.). (pp.77-90). Routledge.

Turner, M. (2007). Conceptual integration. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.377-393). OUP Oxford.

van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Blackwell.

van Dijk, T. A. (2004b). Ideology and discourse. A multidisciplinary introduction. Internet course for the Oberta de Catalunya (UOC). Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University.

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.

LINKS:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/schools-are-becoming-a-battle-of-the-zealots-n2vdx9gsr

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/parents-protest-lgbt-classes-streets-birmingham-school-row/

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/may/26/birmingham-anderton-park-primary-muslim-protests-lgbt- teaching-rights

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/lgbt-lessons-protests-schools-birmingham- manchester-teachers-parents-a8845866.html?amp