Is it ‘the Ukraine crisis’ or a war in Europe? Multiple frames of Russia’s aggression in parliamentary discourse from a comparative MD-CADS perspective

Language, Discourse & SocietyJune 2025

Anna Kryvenko [1]

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15763141

[1] Institute of Contemporary History (Ljubljana, Slovenia) and NISS (Kyiv, Ukraine), ORCID: 0000-0001-6414-7456, ganna.kryvenko@inz.si
 
 

Abstract

This contribution aims to uncover similarities and differences in the construction of war in the Ukrainian and British parliamentary discourses against the dramatic social context of Russia’s unfolding aggression since 2014 and its full-scale invasion of Ukraine starting from 24 February 2022. The study adopts a comparative perspective on the onomasiological salience (Geeraerts, 2017) of alternative designations of armed hostilities used in comparable institutional settings. It is primarily situated within the framework of MD-CADS, with its emphasis on the importance of corpus data segmentation from epistemological, methodological and practical perspectives (Marchi, 2018). Naming choices for the armed hostilities in focus are discussed in relation to
experience-based schematic representations of real-world situations known as frames (Fillmore et al., 2003a; Ruppenhofer et al., 2017) and framing as a discursive practice of selecting “some aspects of a perceived reality” (Entman, 1993: 52) and “introducing some form of cognitive bias” (Charteris-Black, 2019: 16) in parliamentary discourse, which provides valuable data for investigating the intersection between language and social change (Tyrkkö and Kotze, 2023). The data come from two uniformly encoded and comparable corpora under the ParlaMint project: ParlaMint-UA containing plenary proceedings of the Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine’s unicameral parliament, and ParlaMint-GB including transcripts of parliamentary debates from the House of Lords and the House of Commons. The findings suggest that naming and framing of armed hostilities in parliamentary debates have to do with the hybrid legal and political nature of parliamentary discourse as well as an interplay between the institutional and individual choices of the speakers. Spatial and temporal proximity or distance between the speakers and the events in focus affects yet does not determine their conceptualisation as proximal or distant from the speakers themselves as well as from their addressees and is subject to change in the constantly shifting political and geopolitical climate.

Keywords: discursive construction of war, frames and framing, MD-CADS, Ukrainian parliamentary corpus, British parliamentary corpus

References

Ädel, A. (2010). “How to use corpus linguistics in the study of political discourse”. In: O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. eds 2010. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Abingdon: Routledge.

Alyahya, A. F. (2023). “Critical discourse analysis of newspaper articles declaring the outbreak of war in Ukraine: The Washington Post vs. The Moscow Times”. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(2), 47-59.

Bayley, P. (2004). “Introduction: The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discourse”. In: Bayley, P. ed 2004.  Cross-cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 1-44.

Berganza, R., Herrero-Jiménez, B. and Carratalá, A. (2018). “The dynamics of parliamentary debates on war and conflict: assessing the impact and role of the media on the political agenda”. In: Fröhlich, R. ed 2018. Media in War and Armed Conflict Dynamics of Conflict News Production and Dissemination. Oxon / New York: Routledge. Pp. 111-135.

Bielykh, O. M. (2024). “Термінологічні словосполучення із стрижневим компонентом «krieg» та їх переклад на українську мову [Terminological phrases with the core component “krieg” and their translation into Ukrainian]”. Academic Studies. Humanities Series, 1, 40-46.

Bonnet, A.-P. (2023). “War propaganda or political opportunism? How British Prime Ministers have used the war in Ukraine for political gain”. Close Encounters in War Journal, 6, 70-91.

Brezina, V. (2018). “Statistical choices in corpus-based discourse analysis”. In: Taylor, C. and Marchi, A. eds 2018. Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London and New York: Routledge. Pp. 259-280.

Britsyn, V. (2024). “Мова в час війни: функціонування й мовні проскрипції [Language in time of war: functioning and lingual prescriptions]”. In: Azhniuk, B. M. ed 2024. Language and War: The Dynamics of Linguistic Systems and Language Policies. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim Dmytra Buraho. Pp. 123-189.

Bylytsia, Y. (2022). “Активізація вживання політичної фразеології в німецькомовному політичному дискурсі в час війни Росії проти України [The activation of the usage of political phraseology in German political discourse during Russia’s war against Ukraine]”. Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 24(1), 61-68.

Calzada Pérez, M. (2024). “Russia and Ukraine through the eyes of ParlaMint 4.0: A collocational CADS profile of Spanish and British parliamentary discourses”. Proceedings of the IV Workshop on Creating, Analysing, and Increasing Accessibility of Parliamentary Corpora (ParlaCLARIN) @ LREC-COLING 2024, 84−93.

Cap, P. (2013). Proximization. The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Charteris-Black, J. (2019). Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chilton, P. (2014). Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chiluwa, I. and Ruzaite, J. (2024). “Analysing the language of political conflict: a study of war rhetoric of Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky”. Critical Discourse Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2024.2331186

Dinstein, Y. (2017). War, aggression and self-defence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.    

Druzhbiak, S. and Frantsuz, V. (2024). “Особливості вербалізації концептів «війна» та «мир» у політичному дискурсі [Peculiarities of verbalizing the concepts of war and peace in political discourse]”. International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology, 68, 55-60.

Entman, R. M. (1993). “Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm”. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

Erjavec, T. et al. (2024a). Linguistically annotated multilingual comparable corpora of parliamentary debates ParlaMint.ana 4.1, Slovenian language resource repository CLARIN.SI, ISSN 2820-4042. http://hdl.handle.net/11356/1911

Erjavec, T. et al. (2024b). ParlaMint II: advancing comparable parliamentary corpora across Europe. Language Resources & Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-024-09798-w

Fazal, T. M. (2021). “The decline in declarations of war: an exchange”. Security Studies, 30(5), 893-904.

Fillmore, C.  J., Johnson, C. R. and Petruck, M. R. L (2003a). “Background to Framenet”. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235-250.

Fillmore, C. J., Petruck, M. R. L., Ruppenhofer, J. and Wright, A. (2003b). “Framenet in Action: The Case of Attaching”. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 297-332. 

Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S. and Bakema, P. (1994). The Structure of Lexical Variation: Meaning, Naming, and Context. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Geeraerts, D. (2017). “Entrenchment as onomasiological salience”. In: Schmid, H.-J. ed 2017. Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. De Gruyter Mouton; American Psychological Association. Pp. 153-174.

Gruber, J. B. (2021). Troublemakers in the Streets? A Framing Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Protest in the UK 1992–2017 (PhD thesis). University of Glasgow.

Harvard, J. (2016). “War and ‘World Opinion’: Parliamentary Speaking and the Falklands War”. Parliamentary History, 35 (1), 42-53.

Hughes, G. (2008). “Words, war and terror”. English Today, 24(1), 13-17.

Hodges A. ed (2013). Discourses of War and Peace. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.

Ilchenko, O. A. (2023). “Метафорична модель війни в політичному дискурсі українського медіапростору 2014–2023 рр. [The metaphorical model of war in the political discourse of the Ukrainian media space 2014-2023]”. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, Philology and Journalism Series, 34/73(1), 21-25. 

Ilie, C. (2010). “Identity co-construction in parliamentary discourse practices”. In: Ilie, C. ed 2010. European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 57-78.

Ilie, C. (2015). “Parliamentary discourse”. In Tracy, K. ed 2015. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Pp. 1113-1127.

Ilie, C. (2016). “Parliamentary discourse and deliberative rhetoric”. In: Ihalainen, P., Ilie, C. and Palonen, K. eds 2016. Parliament and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History of a European Concept. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books. Pp. 133-145.

Jaworska S. and Kinloch, K. (2018). “Using multiple data sets”. In: Taylor, C. and Marchi, A. eds 2018. Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. Oxon/New York: Routledge. Pp. 110-129.

Ji, D., Jiang, X., and Wang, L. (2024). “Domesticating international news: China’s media coverage of the Russia-Ukraine conflict”. International Communication Gazette, 86(1), 55-72.

Jones, I. (2011). “The NATO Terminology Programme and NATOTerm”. Proceedings of Translating and the Computer 33. London: Aslib. Pp. 1-22.

Kay, C., Roberts, J., Samuels, M. and Wotherspoon, I. eds (2009). Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary. With additional material from A Thesaurus of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Klymenko L. (2019). “Forging Ukrainian national identity through remembrance of World War II”. National Identities 22 (2), 133-150.

Knüpfer, C. B. and Entman, R. M. (2018). “Framing conflicts in digital and transnational media environments”. Media, War & Conflict, 11(4),476-488.

Kovbasyuk, L. (2023). “Новітні студії концепту ВІЙНА в сучасному мовознавстві [The latest studies of the concept ‘war’ in modern linguistics]”. Kherson State University Herald. German Studies and Intercultural Communication Series, 2023(1), 16-21.

Kryvenko, A. and Kopp, M. (2023). “Workflow and metadata challenges in the ParlaMint project: insights from building the ParlaMint-UA corpus”. Proceedings of the CLARIN 2023 Annual Conference, 67-70.

Kryvenko, A. (2025). “‘Maidan has become part of Ukrainian identity’: The dynamics of naming and framing civil resistance in parliamentary discourse [Manuscript accepted for publication]”. Corpora 20(3).

Kyryluk, F. and Kulish, R. (2023). “The concept of ‘ruscism’: essence and features”. Politology Bulletin, 90, 121-131.

Lastres-Lopez, C. (2023). “Morphosyntactic and pragmatic variation in conditional constructions in English and Spanish parliamentary discourse”. In Korhonen, M. Kotze, H. and Tyrkkö, J. eds 2023. Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 308-335.

Marchi, A. (2018). “Dividing up the data: epistemological, methodological and practical impact of diachronic segmentation”. In: Taylor, C. and Marci, A. eds 2018. Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. Oxon/New York: Routledge. Pp. 174-196.

Maslova, Y. (2023). “Вербалізація концептів війна, мир, жінка, чоловік у газетному дискурсі україни у воєнний період [Verbalisation of the concepts war, peace, woman, man in the newspaper discourse of Ukraine during the war period]”. Scientific Proceedings of Ostroh Academy National University: Philology Series, 17(85), 71-77.

Melnyk, S., Nazarenko, O. and Sikorska, V. (2023). “Мовна репрезентація концепту «війна» в сучасному українському медіадискурсі [Linguistic representation of the ‘war’ concept in modern Ukrainian media discourse]”. In: (n. ed) Philological education and science: transformation and modern development vectors. Riga: Baltija Publishing. Pp. 446-467.

Mochtak, M. (2020). “Mythologizing war: legacies of conflict in Croatian parliamentary debates”. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20(3), 491-513.

Mochtak, M., Glaurdić, J. and Lesschaeve, C. (2022). “Talking War: Representation, Veterans and Ideology in Post-War Parliamentary Debates”. Government and Opposition, 57(1), 148-170. 

Musolff, A. (2019). “Metaphor framing in political discourse”. Mythos-Magazin. Politisches Framing, 1, 1-10. 

Nakonechna, H. (2018). “Термінологізація і детермінологізація: ступінь опрацювання й вектори розвитку [Terminologisation and Determinologisation: Extent of Elaboration and Paths of Development]”. In: Kunch, Z., Nakonechna, H., Mykytiuk, O., Bulyk-Verkhola, S., Tehlivets. Y. ed 2018 Term Theory: Specification of Lexico-Semantic Paradigms. Lviv: Halytska Vydavnycha Spilka. Pp. 11-37.

NATO (2020). AAP-06 NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions (English and French). (ed 2020). NATO Standardization Office. https://www.coemed.org/files/stanags/05_AAP/AAP-06_2020_EF_(1).pdf

Partington, A., Duguid, A. and Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Piankovska, I. V. (2022). “Лексичні особливості німецьких медіатекстів на тему «Krieg in der Ukraine» в контексті медіаекології [Lexical features of German media texts on the topic ‘war in Ukraine’ in the context of media ecology]”. New Philology, 2022(86), 144-149.

Polishchuk, N. (2023). “Військова термінолексика в мові сучасних масмедіа [Military lexis in the language of modern mass media]”. Terminolohichnyi Visnyk 2023(7), 100-110.

Psarros, N. (2023). “The Nature of War”. Conatus – Journal of Philosophy, 8(2), 457-475.

Ruppenhofer, J., Boas, H. C. and Baker, C. F. (2017). “FrameNet”. In: Fuertes-Olivera, P. A. ed 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Lexicography. New York and London: Routledge. Pp. 383-398.

Searle, J. R. (1976). “A classification of illocutionary acts”. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23.  

Shevchenko, I., Morozova, I. and Shevchenko, V. (2022). “Nominations of Russian aggression against Ukraine in English-language media: a cognitive-pragmatic study”. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages, 95, 70-77.

Shyrokov V. et al. eds (2018). Словник української мови online [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language online]. Ukrainian Language and Information Fund of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://sum20ua.com/ 

Smith, V. (2021). Naming and Framing: Understanding the Power of Words across Disciplines, Domains, and Modalities. New York and London: Routledge.

Snyder, T. (20 May 2022). “We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.” International New York Times. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=anon~a32c388a&id=GALE%7CA704311701&v=2.1&it=r&sid=googleScholar&asid=38480efc

Stevenson, A. and Waite, M. eds (2012). “War”. In: Concise Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press. P. 1627.

Taylor, C. (2023). “Disinformation and immigration discourses”. In: Maci, S.M., Demata, M., McGlashan, M. and Seargeant, P. eds 2023. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse and Disinformation. New York and London: Routledge. Pp. 171-186.

Tymoshchuk, N. M. (2023). “Euphemisms in Modern Political Discourse: Joseph Biden’s Speeches in the War in Ukraine”. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology, 2(26/2), 210-224.

Tyrkkö, J. and Kotze, H. (2023). “Perspectives on parliamentary discourse: From corpus linguistics to cultural analytics”. In: Korhonen, M., Kotze, H. and Tyrkkö, T. eds 2023. Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 1-16. 

van Leeuwen, T. (2016). “Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice – a guide”. In:  Wodak, R. E. and Meyer, M. eds 2016.Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. (3rd ed.) London: Sage. Pp. 137-153.

Vilchynska, T. (2017). “Концепт «війна»: особливості мовної об’єктивації у газетному тексті [Concept ‘war’: peculiarities of lingual instantiation in newspaper text]”.  Linguistic Studies, 34, 110-114.

Yavorska, G. (2016). “’War’ concept: semantics and pragmatics”. Strategic Priorities. Philosophy Series, 1, 14-23.   

Yavorska, G. (2024). “The discourse of war (several methodological questions)”. In: Azhniuk, B. M. ed 2024. Language and War: The Dynamics of Linguistic Systems and Language Policies. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim Dmytra Buraho. Pp. 211-228.

Yemelianova, O. (2024). “Adjectives as the reflection of the Russian-Ukrainian war perception”. Contemporary Studies in Foreign Philology, 2(26), 7-15.

Zinevich, L. V. and Krasavina V.V. (2017). “Концепт «війна» у сучасному українському суспільно-політичному дискурсі [The concept of ‘war’ in modern Ukrainian socio-political discourse]”. Odessa Linguistic Journal, 2017(Special Issue), 70-72.