[1] Ain Shams University, Department of German, Canada, e-mail: fedderse@ualberta.ca ORCID: 0000-0002-9431-9631
[2] University of Waterloo, Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies, Canada, e-mail: c7sutherland@uwaterloo.ca, ORCID: 0009-0007-6109-7802
[3] University of Waterloo, Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies, Canada, e-mail: gliebscher@uwaterloo.ca, ORCID: 0000-0003-2821-840X
[4] University of Alberta, Department of Modern Languages and Cultural Studies, Canada, e-mail: jenniedo@ualberta.ca, ORCID: 0000-0002-5363-7334
Abstract
Commercial signage in public urban spaces is a site of language commodification, as businesses use language(s) to sell goods and experiences to their desired customer base. This study investigates the use of English in the semiotic landscapes of the German cities Mannheim and Leipzig, focusing on the symbolic value of English, as one specific kind of commodification, in commercial contexts.
Our analysis is based on a corpus of approximately 5000 photographs of visible instances of writing in any language from Mannheim and Leipzig, collected between 2019 and 2021 as part of a larger research project. Drawing on selected images featuring a commodified use of English, our analysis combines geosemiotics (Scollon & Scollon, 2003) and Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis (ELLA; Blommaert, 2013) with the concept of scaling (Stroud & Mpendukana, 2009) to examine semiotic resources such as spatial placement and visual design. In addition, we employ Membership Categorization Analysis (Schegloff, 2007) to investigate how signs construct potential customer identities, with particular attention to class-based distinctions understood through Bourdieu’s (e.g., 1977) notion of symbolic capital.
While previous research has shown that English in Germany is commonly associated with internationality and modernity, our findings suggest that in addition, businesses draw not only on global connotations of English, but also its local meanings to construct membership categories linked to age, lifestyle, and class, evoking luxury and prestige. Commodified English thereby becomes a way of communicating what is desirable that relies on all of the specifically local connotations of English as a global language and an anticipation of the audience for each sign, including their desires.
Keywords: commodification, semiotic landscape, English, symbolic capital, Germany
References
Androutsopoulos, J., & Chowchong, A. (2021). Sign-genres, authentication, and emplacement: The signage of Thai restaurants in Hamburg, Germany. Linguistic Landscape, 7(2), 204–234. https://doi. org/10.1075/ll.20011.and
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.) (1998). Identities in talk. SAGE Publications.
Ben-Rafael, E., & Ben-Rafael, M. (2016). Berlin’s linguistic landscape: Two faces of globalization. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza, & H. Woldmariam (Eds.), Negotiating and contesting identities in linguistic landscapes (pp. 197-214). Bloomsbury.
Blommaert, J. (2003). Commentary: A sociolinguistics of globalization. Journal of Sociolinguistic, 7(4), 607-623.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Situating language rights: English and Swahili in Tanzania revisited. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 390–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00298.x
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Multilingual Matters.
Blommaert, J. (2016). “Meeting of Styles” and the online infrastructures of graffiti. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(2), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-0005
Bohuslavska, O., & Ciprianová, E. (2024). English in the Slovak glocalized urban space: A study of the English language and the processes of glocalization in the linguistic landscape of Bratislava. English Today, 40(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078423000081
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847701600601
Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire. Fayard.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power (J. B. Thompson, Ed., Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Bruzos, A. (2023). Can language be commodified? Toward a Marxist theory of language commodification. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 20(2), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2 102012
Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press.
Collins, J., & Slembrouck, S. (2007). Reading Shop Windows in Globalized Neighborhoods: Multilingual Literacy Practices and Indexicality. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(3), 335–356. https://doi. org/10.1080/10862960701613128
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fuller, J. M. (2019). Linguistic landscapes and the making of an imagined community. In T. Heyd, F. Mengden, & B. Schneider (Eds.), The sociolinguistic economy of Berlin: Cosmopolitan perspectives on language, diversity and social space (pp. 279–298). De Gruyter. https://doi. org/10.1515/9781501508103-012
Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299064
Heller, M., & Duchêne, A. (2012). Pride and profit: Changing discourses of language, capital and nation-state. In A. Duchêne & M. Heller (Eds.), Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit (pp. 1-21). Routledge.
Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238
Heller, M. (2010). The Commodification of Language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 101–114.
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (pp. 35–84). School of American Research Press.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic Landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. https://doi. org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
Lanza, E., & Woldermarian, H. (2014). Indexing modernity: English and branding in the linguistic landscape of Addis Ababa. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 491-506.
Papen, U. (2012). Commercial discourses, gentrification and citizens’ protest: The linguistic landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-9841.2011.00518.x
Papen, U. (2015). Signs in cities: The discursive production and commodification of urban spaces. Sociolinguistic Studies, 9(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v9i1.21627
Park, J. S.-Y., & Wee, L. (2021). Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. Routledge.
Park, J. S.-Y., & Wee, L. (2021). World Englishes and the Commodification of Language. In R. Rubdy, R. Tupas, & M. Saraceni (Eds.). Bloomsbury world englishes volume 2: Ideologie (pp. 64-80). Bloomsbury.
Pusch, L. (1984). Das Deutsche als Männersprache. Suhrkamp.
Roudometof, V. (2016). Glocalization: a critical introduction. Routledge
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II (Repr.). Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007a). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 462–482. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
Schegloff, E. A. (2007b). Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079162
Schneider, B. (2020). Language in transnational communities of consumption: Indexical functions of English in Third Wave CoffeeCulture. In S. Rüdiger & S. Mühleisen (Eds.), IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society (Vol. 47, pp. 79–98). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https:// doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.05sch
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724
Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S. (2009). Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00410.x
Takhtarova, S. S., Kalegina, T. E., & Yarullina, F. I. (2015). The role of English in shaping the Linguistic Landscape of Paris, Berlin and Kazan. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.531
Tan, P., & Rubdy, R. (Eds.) (2008). Language as commodity: global structure, local marketplaces. Continuum.