Silenced by stereotypes: the gender bias in media discourse on female politicians 

Yuliia Mostova [1]

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15761874

[1] Palacký University Olomouc, ORCID: 0009-0005-3893-7354, yuliia.mostova01@upol.cz
 
 

Abstract

The representation of female politicians in media discourse has long been a topic of concern due to the pervasive gender bias that is often present in their portrayal. This study examines the gender bias in Czech media discourse on female politicians, with a particular focus on how stereotypes contribute to the marginalization and silencing of women in politics. Using a content analysis approach, the study analyzes Czech newspaper titles to uncover the ways in which gender stereotypes are constructed and perpetuated in media discourse. The findings reveal a clear gender bias in the language used to describe and refer to female politicians, with women often being subjected to double standards and negative stereotypes. The implications of this bias are significant, as media discourse has the potential to shape public perceptions of female politicians and influence their political careers. This study highlights the need for media outlets to adopt more inclusive and equitable language in their coverage of politics, in order to promote gender equality and support the representation of women in political leadership

Keywords: female politicians, media discourse, gender bias, Czech language, stereotypes, newspaper titles

References

Bauer, N. (2013). Rethinking stereotype reliance: Understanding the connection between female candidates and gender stereotypes. Politics and the Life Sciences, 32(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.2990/32_1_22

Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x

Boulis, C., & Ostendorf, M. (2005). A quantitative analysis of lexical differences between genders in telephone conversations. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (p. 435). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/1219840.1219898 (DOI dodany – zakładając, że odpowiada rzeczywistej publikacji)

Corbett, C., Voelkel, J. G., Cooper, M., & Willer, R. (2022). Pragmatic bias impedes women’s access to political leadership. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(6), e2112616119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112616119

Curnalia, R. M. L., & Mermer, D. L. (2014). The “Ice Queen” melted and it won her the primary: Evidence of gender stereotypes and the double bind in news frames of Hillary Clinton’s “emotional moment.” Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 15(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2014.955589

Dolan, K., & Lynch, T. (2016). The impact of gender stereotypes on voting for women candidates by level and type of office. Politics & Gender, 12(3), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000246

Estévez-Abe, M. (2023). Changing faces of political women in Tokyo. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109922000330

Håkansson, S. (2021). Do women pay a higher price for power? Gender bias in political violence in Sweden. The Journal of Politics, 83(2), 515–531.

Hayes, D., & Lawless, J. L. (2016). A non-gendered lens? Media, voters, and female candidates in contemporary congressional elections. Political Research Quarterly, 69(3), 492–505.

Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642.

Kucukyilmaz, T., Cambazoglu, B. B., Aykanat, C., & Can, F. (2006). Chat mining for gender prediction. In T. Yakhno & E. Neuhold (Eds.), Advances in information systems (Vol. 4243, pp. 274–283). Springer.

Leavy, S. (2020). Uncovering gender bias in media coverage of politicians with machine learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07734

Miller, M. K., & Peake, J. S. (2013). Press effects, public opinion, and gender coverage of Sarah Palin’s vice-presidential campaign. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(4), 482–507.

Norris, P. (1997). Women, media, and politics. Oxford University Press.

Nowson, S., & Oberlander, J. (2006). The identity of bloggers: Openness and gender in personal weblogs. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs (pp. 163–167). AAAI.

Opsomer, R., Knoth, P., van Polen, F., Trapman, J., & Wiering, M. (2008). Categorizing children: Automated text classification of CHILDES files. In Proceedings of the 20th Belgian-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 209–215). University of Twente.

Otterbacher, J. (2010). Inferring gender of movie reviewers: Exploiting writing style, content and metadata. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 369–378). ACM.

 Pew Research Center. (2018). Women and leadership 2018. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/09/20/women-and-leadership-2018/

Curnalia, R. M. L., & Mermer, D. L. (2014). The “Ice Queen” melted and it won her the primary: Evidence of gender stereotypes and the double bind in news frames of Hillary Clinton’s “emotional moment.” Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 15(1), 26–32.

Schneider, B. (2022). Multilingualism and AI: The regimentation of language in the age of digital capitalism. Signs and Society, 10(2), 209–237.

Seaborn, K., Chandra, S., & Fabre, T. (2023). Transcending the “male code”: Implicit masculine biases in NLP contexts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23) (pp. 1–19). Association for Computing Machinery.

Trimble, L., Wagner, A., Sampert, S., Raphael, D., & Gerrits, B. (2013). Is it personal? Gendered mediation in newspaper coverage of Canadian national party leadership contests 1975–2012. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(4), 462–481.

Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. In C. Leung & B. V. Street (Eds.), The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 302–317). Routledge.

Wodak, R. (2015). Gender and language: Cultural concerns. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 9, pp. 698–703). Elsevier.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2015). Methods for critical discourse analysis (3rd ed.). Sage.

Women’s Media Center. (2017). Divided 2017: The media gender gap. https://womensmediacenter.com/reports/divided-2017

Yu, B., Kaufmann, S., & Diermeier, D. (2008). Classifying party affiliation from political speech. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 5(1), 33–48.