Emily Springer
Social Justice and Human Rights, New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University espringer@asu.edu or spri0075@umn.edu.
Abstract
Political discourse typically focuses on public oratory comments by politicians which are meticulously prepared and framed in advance, representing their political platforms. In the international development sector, there are few opportunities for conventional political discourse. Instead development organizations reach public audiences through manicured “success stories” which detail their programmatic interventions around the world. The focus of this study is on how publicly available documentation from international development organizations subtly reinforces a historicist understanding of global difference, with material consequences for which development agendas are able to garner legitimacy. Utilizing critical discourse analysis as a methodology, I use the case of the seven publicly available “profiles of progress” of African agricultural development projects funded by a recent large private foundation. As political discourse, these re-presentations of farmers serve political aims for promoting a particular version of agricultural development. I identify two strategies by which these profiles build epistemic legitimacy: (1) “scientizing” the profiles with the inclusion of quantified metrics and (2) using the voices of smallholder farmers to “authenticate” the narratives. I demonstrate that African smallholder farmers are presented in three possible roles: farmer-as-stagnant, farmer-in-modernity, and farmer-as-businessman. These re-presentations normalize the idea of Western superiority, ultimately serving the political needs of development donors to appear as legitimate benefactors. I argue that these profiles are not benign but serve as organizational contributions to an episteme concretizing around a particular political agenda: agribusiness as the solution to 21st century food security.
Keywords: Development, Critical Discourse Analysis, Historicism, Agriculture.
References
Baxi, Upendra. (2007). “The Uncanny Idea of Development.” Pp. 76-123 in Human Rights in a Posthuman World: Critical Essays.“The Uncanny Idea of Development.” New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Bhambra, Gurminder. (2010). Sociology After Postcolonialism: Provincialized Cosmopolitanisms and Connected Sociologies. Decolonizing European Sociology. Burlington: Ashgate.
Boatca, Manuela and Sergio Costa. (2010). Postcolonial Sociology: A Research Agenda. Decolonizing European Sociology. Burlington: Ashgate.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. (2000). Provincializing Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chant, Sylvia. (2016). “Galvanizing Girls for Development? Critiquing the Shift from ‘Smart’ to ‘Smarter Economics.’” Progress in Development Studies 16 (4): 314–28.
Chant, Sylvia, and Caroline Sweetman. (2012). “Fixing Women or Fixing the World? ‘Smart Economics’, Efficiency Approaches, and Gender Equality in Development.” Gender & Development 20 (3): 517–29.
Connell, Raewyn. (2007). Southern Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
De Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Nunes, and Maria Meneses. (2007). “Opening up the Canon of Knowledge and Recognition of Difference” in Another Knowledge is Possible. New York: Verso.
Dixon, Deborah P., and Holly M. Hapke. 2003. “Cultivating Discourse: The Social Construction of Agricultural Legislation.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (1): 142–64.
Douzinas, Costas. (2007). Human Rights and Empire: The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism.New York, New York: Routledge-Cavendish.
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Routledge.
Fejerskov, Adam Moe. 2017. “The New Technopolitics of Development and the Global South as a Laboratory of Technological Experimentation:” Science, Technology, & Human Values, May.
Graham, Linda J. (Aug. 2011). “The Product of Text and “Other” Statements: Discourse Analysis and the Critical Use of Foucault.” Educational Philosophy & Theory, 43(6), 663–74.
Groscurth, Christopher. (2011). Paradoxes of Privilege and Participation: The Case of the American Red Cross. Communication Quarterly 59(3): 296-314.
Janker, Judith, Stefan Mann, and Stephan Rist. 2018. “What Is Sustainable Agriculture? Critical Analysis of the International Political Discourse.” Sustainability 10 (12): 4707.
Li, Tania M. (2008). “Exit from Agriculture: A Step Forward Or a Step Backward for the Rural Poor?” The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(3):629-636.
McCormick, Alexandra. (2012). Whose Education Policies in Aid-Receiving Countries? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Quality and Normative Transfer through Cambodia and Laos. Comparative Education Review 56(1):18-47.
Mignolo, Walter D. 2007. “Introduction.” Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 155–67.
Mohanty, Chandra. (2003). ““Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles.” Signs 28(2): 499-535.
Mutua, Makau. (2008). “Human Rights in Africa: The Limited Promise of Liberalism.” African Studies Review 51(1):17-39
Ney, Steven. (2012). Making Sense of the Global Health Crisis: Policy Narratives, Conflict, and Global Health Governance. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 37(2): 253-295.
Odame, Hannington and Elijah Muange. (2011). Can Agro-dealers Deliver the Green Revolution in Kenya? IDS Bulletin 42(4):78-89.
Parker, Ian. (1992). “Discovering discourses, tackling texts” in Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London: Routledge, pp. 252-261.
Quijano, Aníbal. 2000. “Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America.” International Sociology 15 (2): 215–32.
Roberts, Adrienne, and Susanne Soederberg. (2012). “Gender Equality as Smart Economics ? A Critique of the 2012 World Development Report.” Third World Quarterly 33 (5): 949–68.
Sachs, Wolfgang. 1992. The Development Dictionary. 2nd ed. London & New York: Zed Books.
Said, Edward. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
Schröter, Melani, and Charlotte Taylor. (2018). “Introduction.” Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse: Empirical Approaches, edited by Melani Schröter and Charlotte Taylor, Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 1–21.
Schurman, Rachel. 2018. “Micro(Soft) Managing a ‘Green Revolution’ for Africa: The New Donor Culture and International Agricultural Development.” World Development 112 (December): 180–92.
Scoones, Ian and John Thompson. (2011). “The Politics of Seed in Africa’s Green Revolution: Alternative Narratives and Competing Pathways.” IDS Bulletin 42(4):1-23.
Scoones, Ian. (2011). Can Agricultural Biotechnology be Pro-Poor? A skeptical look at the emerging “consensus.” IDS Bulletin 33(4):114-119.
Stoler, Ann. (2002a). Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stoler, Ann Laura. (2002b). “Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance: On the Content in the Form.” Carolyn Hamilton et al, eds., Refiguring the Archive. David Philip, pp. 83-100.
Thompson, John and Ian Scoones. (2009). Addressing the dynamics of agri-food systems: an emerging agenda for social science research. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 386-397.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2009). Society and discourse. How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vanhaute, Eric. (2011). “From Famine to Food Crisis: What History can Teach Us about Local and Global Subsistence Crises.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(1):47-65.
Vavrus, Fran and Seghers. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis in Comparative Education: A Discursive Study of “Partnership” in Tanzania’s Poverty Reduction Policies. Comparative Education Review 54(1): 77-103.
Venkataraman, Nina. (2018). “What’s Not in a Frame? Analysis of Media Representations of the Environmental Refugee.” Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse: Empirical Approaches, edited by Melani Schröter and Charlotte Taylor, Springer International Publishing, pp. 241–79.
von Braun, Joachim and Ruth Meinzen-Dick. (2009). “Land grabbing” by foreign investors in developing countries: Risks and opportunities. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Policy Briefs No. 13.
Wang, Jiayu. (January 2016). “A New Political and Communication Agenda for Political Discourse Analysis: Critical Reflections on Critical Discourse Analysis and Political Discourse Analysis.” International Journal of Communication, 10, 2766–84.