Abstract
In this work, we analyse the polarized debate about whether or not to restrict the use of private cars in the city of Barcelona, which took place between February 2023 and February 2024, a period in which municipal elections were held and the new city council was formed. We analyse, first, fragments of declarations, published in the local media, of two politicians from left-wing political parties, the current mayor, Jaume Collboni, from the Socialist Party (PSC), and the spokesperson of the main opposition party, En Comú, an environmentalist party. Secondly, the declarations of the spokesperson of a group of entrepreneurs in the city centre, who were opposed to any kind of restrictions on the use of cars, and those of two citizens’ platforms in favour of a more sustainable city. Using a methodology of Discourse Analysis, we describe the most important formal devices that show how two opposed cognitive frames are activated: the right to the unrestricted use of the car (based on the ontological metaphor “the car is a right”), as against the rights of citizens to have a more sustainable city (using lexical elements referring to the negative attributes of cars). The frame defended by the current mayor (the third) is nearer to the former, although he does formulate it in a more subtle and implicit way. The work also includes a brief reflection on the differences between the discursive analysis of this type of discourse and the content analysis carried out by other social disciplines.
Keywords: Polarised conflicts; analysis of polarised discourse; analysis of environmental discourse; urban mobility; climate change denial; cognitive frame; ontological metaphor; (Critical) Discourse Analysis.
References
Alcíbar Cuello, M. (2023). Medioambiente y estudios del discurso. In: López-Ferreiro, C., Carranza, I. E. and van Dijk, T. A. eds 2023. Estudios del Discurso. The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Language Discourse Studies. London: Routledge. Pp. 287-301.
Barlett, T. and Montesano Montessori, N. (2020). Towards webs of equivalence and the political nomad in agonistic debate. Contributions from CDA and scales theory. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20046.bar
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc.
Blommaert, J. and Jie, D. (2010). Ethnographic Fieldwork. A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Blommaert, J. and Varis, P. (2015). The importance of unimportant language. Multilingual Margins, 2(1), 4-9.
Caimotto, M. C. (2024). Mobility justice: An ecolinguistic perspective. Languages, 9, 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070242
Capra, F. (1996). La Trama de la Vida. Una Nueva Perspectiva de los Sistemas Vivos. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Deignan, A., Semino, E. and Paul, Sh.-A. (2019). Metaphors of climate science in three genres: research articles, educational texts, and secondary school student talk. Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx035
Domínguez, M., Moreno, S. and Pina, T. (2022). In: Filardo-Llamas, L., Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. eds 2022. Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict. London: Routledge. Pp. 215-234. https://www.routledge.com/Discursive-Approaches-to-Socio-political-Polarization-and-Conflict/Filardo-Llamas-Morales-Lopez-Floyd/p/book/9780367529253#
Doughty, K. and Murray, L. (2016). Discourses of mobility: Institutions, everyday lives and embodiment. Mobilities, 11(2), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.941257
Duranti, A. (1997). Antropología Lingüística. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001). El análisis crítico del discurso como método para la investigación en las ciencias sociales. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, R. eds 2001. Métodos de Análisis Crítico del Discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa. Pp. 179-201.
Feindt, P. H. and Oels, A. (2005). Introduction. Does Discourse Matter? Discourse Analysis in Environmental Policy Making (special issue). Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3). 161-173, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15239080500339638
Filardo-Llamas, L. and Morales-López, E. (2022). Introduction. In: Filardo-Llamas, L., Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. eds 2022. Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict. London: Routledge. Pp. 1-22. https://www.routledge.com/Discursive-Approaches-to-Socio-political-Polarization-and-Conflict/Filardo-Llamas-Morales-Lopez-Floyd/p/book/9780367529253
Filardo-Llamas, L. and Pérez-Hernández, L. (2025). Metaphors of resistance in the counter-discourse of Spanish, English and Dutch cycling activists. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 29(1): 103-127. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-42985
Fillmore, Ch. (1982). Frame Semantics. In: The Linguistics Society of Korea ed 1982. Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Selected Papers from SICOL- 1981. Hanshing Publishing Company. Pp. 111-137.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
Herdt, T. and Muñoz Sanz, V. (2023). Experts as game changers? A critical discourse analysis of climate measures in the metropolitan region of Amsterdam. Urban Planning, 8(2), 307-321.
Incelli, E. (2020). The discourse of eco-cities as an ethical commitment: A comparative study in English specialized domains. Lingue e Linguaggi, 34, 99-118. https://doi.org.10.1285/i22390359v34p99
Jacobs, K. (1999). Key themes and future prospects: Conclusion to the special issue. Urban Studies, 36(1), 203-213.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant. Know your Values and Frame the Debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metáforas de la Vida Cotidiana. Madrid: Cátedra.
Maturana, H. (2006). Self-consciousness: How? When? Where? Constructivist Foundations, 1(3), 91-102.
Molpeceres, S. (2017) Posthumanism and the city. In: Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. eds 2017. Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts. Constructivist Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 203-226.
Montesano Montessori, N. (2020). Critical Language Awareness: Opening spaces for educational praxis in turbulent times of transition and crisis. In: Montesano Montessori, N. and Lengkeek, G. eds Opening up Spaces for Meaningful Engagement in Educational Praxis. Utrecht: Eburon. Pp. 120-150.
Montesano Montessori, N. (2023). Critical Policy Discourse Studies. In: Handford, M. and Gee, J. P. eds 2023. Handbook of Discourse Studies. London: Routledge. Pp. 610-624.
Montesano Montessori, N. and Morales-López, E. (2015). Multimodal narrative as an instrument for social change: reinventing democracy in Spain -the case of 15M. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines (CADAAD), 7(2): 200-222. http://www.cadaad.net/journal
Morales-López, E. (2016). La ironía en los discursos de cambio social. Oralia, 19: 177-200. https://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/ORALIA/issue/view/339
Morales-López, E. (2017). Cognitive frames, imaginaries and discursive constructions: Post 15M’s dis- courses with reference to eco-social alternatives. In: Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. eds 2017. Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist Perspectives on Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71
Morales-López, E. (2019). Discourse analysis: Constructivist perspective and transdisciplinarity. In; Bastardas-Boada, A., Massip-Bonet, À. and Bel-Enguix, G. eds 2019. Applications of Complexity Theory in Language and Communication Sciences. New York: Springer. Pp. 187-205.
Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. (2025) Citizens’ polarised discourses on climate change and mobility: The conflict with Barcelona Mayor Ada Colau. Pragmatics & Society. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.24032.mor
Payrató, Ll. and Salvador, V. (2021). El hablar y el estilo. In: Loureda, O. and Schrott, A. eds 2021. La Lingüística del Hablar y sus Ámbitos. Berlin: De Gruyter. Pp. 559-577.
Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Tratado de la Argumentación. La Nueva Retórica. Madrid: Gredos.
Perelman, Ch. (1997). L’Empire Rhétorique. Rhétorique et Argumentation. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Pujante, D. (2024). El Mundo en la Palabra. Barcelona: Ariel.
Salvador, V. (2022a). In: Filardo-Llamas, L., Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. eds 2022. Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict. London: Routledge. Pp. 235-252. https://www.routledge.com/Discursive-Approaches-to-Socio-political-Polarization-and-Conflict/Filardo-Llamas-Morales-Lopez-Floyd/p/book/9780367529253
Salvador, V. (2022b). Análisis del discurso y retórica constructivista. Una aplicación de la teorización francófona. In: Pujante, D. and Alonso Prieto, J. eds 2022. Una Retórica Constructivista. Creación y Análisis del Discurso Social. Castellón: Universitat Jaume I. Pp. 163-172.
Scollon, R. (2001). Acción y texto. Para una comprensión conjunta del lugar del texto en la (inter)acción social, el análisis mediato del discurso y el problema de la acción social. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. eds 2001. Métodos de Análisis Crítico del Discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa. Pp. 205-264.
Scollon, R. (2008). Analysing Public Discourse. Discourse Analysis in the Mapping of Public Policy. London: Routletge.
Shi, W., Haohuan, F., Peinan, W., Changfeng, Ch. and Xiong, J. (2020). #Climatechange vs. #Globalwarm- ing: Characterizing two competing climate discourses on Twitter with semantic tetwork and tem- poral analyses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031062
Skorstad, B. and Mohus, Th. (2022). Four statements and a storyline – discourses in urban green trans- formation. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 9(3), 326-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2022.2090400
Slama-Cazacu, T. (1970). Lenguaje y Contexto. México, DC: Grijalbo.
Van der Aa, J. and Blommaert, J. (2015). Ethnographic monitoring and the study of complexity. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 123. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323534550_Ethnographic_monitoring_and_the_study_of_complexity
van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Ideología y Discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Discurso y Poder. Barcelona: Gedisa.
White, H. (1973). Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in the Nineteenth Century in Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
White, H. (1987). El Contenido de la Forma. Narrativa, Discurso y Representación Histórica. Barcelona: Paidós.